I would like to see observations play a greater role in
assessing children’s achievement in all areas during the public school years. In the preschool years, watching children as
they play, interact with one another, problem solve, and develop knowledge about
an array of topics is how early childhood educators determine how much children
have developed psychosocially, biosocially, and cognitively. An assessment tool, like Teaching Strategies
Gold (the one we use at our center), relies on multiple observations for
determining how far on a continuum a child has come for 49 areas of development
that are divided between eight headings-physical, mathematical, language,
literacy, science/technology, social studies, cognitive and social. The core topics covered on the standardized
tests are observed in addition to other areas important for a child’s
success. If a tool like this exists for
preschool age children, why can’t one be developed for school age children, at
least for the first three years of public school? I realize that class size varies greatly
between preschool settings and public school rooms, and teachers may feel they
don’t have time to observe every child every day, but if classroom teachers are
interacting with their students on a meaningful level, they are observing the
students skill level all the time. Adding
some objective observations to the scores children receive on standardized
tests would give a better view of achievement.
In Nova Scotia, Canada,
children are assessed in reading and writing in grade three, mathematics in
grade four, and all three subject areas in grades six and eight (Nova Scotia, Canada, 2012). The third grade reading/writing assessment is
composed of reading passages in four different genres and answering comprehension
questions. Students write one personal
narrative and one procedural task entry (Nova Scotia,
Canada,
2012). The sixth grade reading test is
composed of the same four genres as the third grade test and similar
comprehension questions. In the writing
portion of the fourth grade assessment, students are asked to write one letter
and one story. The math test is made up
of multiple choice (selected response) and problem solving (constructed
response) questions that are evaluated for understanding and communication (Nova Scotia, Canada, 2012). There was no information about the fourth
grade math test or the eighth grade tests provided on the website because they
have not administered them this year.
I
understand that school assessments need to be fair and equitable across our
country, but what bothers me is how much emphasis we place on the results. Not all children are confident test takers,
as my younger sister was not, and the true level of their knowledge is not
reflected on a standardized test. My
youngest child did very well on these tests but even though he received high
marks, I knew the scores only reflected a small part of his ability. They did not encompass who he was as a
person, nor did it define his intelligences Berger (2009) writes about. It is my belief that our country would
restructure attitudes about our public schools, make kindergarten through third
grade class sizes much smaller and put abundant funding into these years,, we
could eradicate, or at least minimize, many learning, reading, self-esteem, and
bullying problems among others.
References
Berger, K. S.
(2009). The developing person through childhood. New
York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Nova
Scotia, Canada. (2012).
Welcome, evaluation services, assessment schedule, minister’s report to
parents and guardians. Retrieved from http://plans.ednet.ns.ca/
Laurie-
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree with you that standardized tests have many flaws. I too believe that more emphasis should be placed on observation of the child. Thank you for your information on assessment in Canada!